ISRAEL'S SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
by Yoram Ettinger
1. Israel's security
requirements derive from the explosive Middle East, which requires an
unusually high national security threshold, due to the 14-century-old
intra-Muslim and intra-Arab unpredictability, intolerance, violence,
volatility, fragmentation, treachery and the absence of intra-Arab
peaceful-coexistence.
2. The Jewish state is
located in a region, which is dominated by an Islam-driven worldview
which has never tolerated non-Muslim, "infidel" sovereignty in the,
supposedly, abode-of-Islam. The 1,400-year-old raging nature of the
Middle East precedes the establishment of Israel, and it haunts the
globe irrespective of Israel's policies, conflicts or existence.
3. Israel's national
security requirements grow in direct proportion to the intensification
of Middle Eastern and global unpredictability - recently exhibited by
the tectonic Arab Tsunami - which produced radical regime-change,
highlighting the provisional nature of Arab policies and agreements.
4. Global and Middle
Eastern unpredictability has been documented by the collapse of the
Soviet Union; global transformation from bi-polar, to multi-polar,
confrontations; the strategic retreat by the US and the draconian cuts
in its defense budget and size of military force; the eruption of
international terrorism; the spill-over of Islam-driven terrorism into
Europe and the US; the disintegration of Libya, Iraq, Syria and Yemen;
the rising threat of conventional and nuclear Iran; the downfall of the
supposedly invincible Mubarak, Assad, Saddam Hussein and Qaddafi; etc.
5. The increase of
Israel's security requirements is a common-sense-derivative of the
unpredictable, volcanic eruptions which could afflict the Middle East
and beyond. For instance, a regime change in highly-vulnerable Jordan
would transform Israel's currently peaceful, longest and most critical
300-mile-border - the closest to Jerusalem, Ben Gurion Airport, Tel Aviv
and 80% of Israel's population and infrastructures - into a most lethal
threat to Israel's homeland and national security, producing chaos in
Israel's heartland. A regime change in Jordan would exacerbate
Palestinian terrorism, possibly forging a radical bloc from Iran to the
Jordan Valley, posing a clear and present danger to the relatively
pro-US regimes in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, Oman and Egypt.
6. Israel's added
security requirements are also a derivative of a potential regime change
in Egypt, from the current moderate military regime to the explosive
Muslim Brotherhood, the largest trans-Islamic terror organization. It
would provide a tailwind to Gaza-based Palestinian terrorism, as well as
to Islam-based terrorism in northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and
throughout Africa, severely undermining US geo-strategic concerns.
7. The drastic cuts in
the US defense budget, combined with the US retreat from Afghanistan and
Iraq, the nuclear agreement with the Ayatollahs and the US policy of
engagement with - rather than confrontation of - rogue regimes are
perceived, by rogue regimes, as weakness, undermining the US posture of
deterrence, which has been a critical force of stabilization. Israel's
security requirements must assume that the erosion of the US military
power projection may be sustained, energizing rogue regimes in the
Middle East and throughout the globe, dramatically undermining homeland
and national security of Israel and all other Western democracies.
8. Expecting Israel to
retreat from the 3,000 ft.-steep-mountain ridges of Judea and Samaria -
which dominate the Jordan Valley, the Jerusalem enclave, the main
highway which connects Jerusalem to the coastal plane, Israel's only
international airport, Tel Aviv and the 9-15 mile sliver along the
Mediterranean - requires Israel to sacrifice Middle East, intra-Muslim
and global reality on the altar of delusion, to relinquish 4,000 years
of Jewish historical, religious cultural and national roots, to repeat -
rather than avoid - past errors (such as yielding land to the
Palestinian Authority, in 1993 and 2005, which intensified terrorism and
hate education), to ignore the treacherous intra-Arab Palestinian track
record, and to rely on inherently tenuous diplomatic and military
agreements, warranties and guarantees.
9. Lt. General (ret.)
Tom Kelly, Chief of Operations in the 1991 Gulf War, stated: "I cannot
defend Israel without the West Bank.... The West Bank Mountains, and
especially their 5 approaches, are the critical terrain. If an enemy
secures those passes, Jerusalem and Israel become uncovered. Without
the West Bank, Israel is only 8 miles wide at its narrowest point. That
makes it indefensible."
10. Military high-tech
today will be low-tech tomorrow, but high ground always remains high
ground. Moreover, any technology can be jammed, but one cannot jam the
mountainous topography of Judea & Samaria. Israel's control of the
Judea and Samaria mountain ridges minimizes threats to homeland security
and national security, providing Israel with the time required to
mobilize its active reservists (75% of the military force!) in case of a
surprise Arab offensive, as happened in 1973, when Israel was on a
verge of destruction. A retreat from the mountain ridges of Judea and
Samaria would import the terroristic Gaza-reality to Judea &
Samaria, transforming Israel from an assertive national security
producer - for the US - to a feeble national security consumer,
burdening the US.
EDITOR'S NOTE:
This insightful article by former Ambassador Yoram Ettinger once again
emphasizes that Israel's defense comes from the LORD GOD of ISRAEL!
THE TEARS SEEN ROUND THE WORLD
by Isaac Kohn
He cried. The poor,
broken man stood there, in his signature pose, his glasses sitting on
the tip of his nose, his eyes looking out above the frames and his voice
choked with emotion.
A tear or two actually
were seen shining in the corners of his eyes. In a voice packed with
emotion the man decried the "mean-spirited, un-American" executive order
issued by President Trump temporarily restricting the visas of would-be
immigrants from seven Muslim countries - later overturned by federal
judge James Robart. Oh, my goodness! My heart shattered for this poor,
sensitive, emotional man. It took me about three seconds to come to my
senses.
Who is Charles Schumer
kidding? What exactly was he trying to convey? Was it his deep feelings
for the down-trodden, for the persecuted, for the expelled, that
overtook him at the moment the temporary immigration ban (temporary)
went into effect? Was he really so deeply distressed at the prospect
that perhaps one of those temporarily barred, so-called refugees, would
be closely vetted and found to harbor ill intentions? Or, perhaps, his
humanity simply could not bear the thought that people from countries
seeking to harm the United States will have to answer some serious
questions before being allowed to enter and roam free amongst us?
I have a few questions
for you, Mr. Schumer. I would like you to answer the following
questions which bother every normal person who is not a bleeding-heart
liberal bent on continuing the destruction of the United States by
following the path trampled by President Trump's predecessor. I hope
you don't mind.
Do you lock your
windows and doors at night or do you leave them open? Do you have an
intercom in your residence? Have you installed security cameras so that
intruders are seen and caught prior to causing you or members of your
family any harm? Based on your contention that barring harm-intentioned
immigrants from our shores is 'un-American and ill spirited', how can
you take precautions to stop illegal intruders from your home? Can you
answer these for me?
Mr. Schumer:
Most of the Moslem
countries in the world forbid Israelis from entering their countries.
Many of them also forbid any Jew from setting foot in their lands. I
don't remember seeing you shed one tear for those Jews barred from
Yemen, Iraq, Syria and the rest. Why not?
I don't remember seeing
you tear-up from the horror stories relating how the Yazidi population
is being slaughtered, abused, beaten and sold into slavery by the ISIS
murderers. Hundreds of thousands have been massacred in Syria and I
have yet to see you shed one tear for the thousands of women and
children murdered and mutilated by Bashar Assad. And, please remind me
if I'm wrong, but I don't remember you bemoaning the kidnapping and
molesting of hundreds of young school girls by the Nigerian Islamist
terror group, Boka Haram.
It is interesting, Mr.
Schumer, that the prior occupant of the White House did as he pleased,
including banning refugees from Iraq, yet you didn't spit out a single
protest.
Women in Saudi Arabia
are degraded and treated as property to be sold, traded and abused at
will. They have extremely few, if any, privileges other than those
approved by their male 'owner,' be it husband, brother, son or other
male. How is it that you never cried over their plight?
Where is your concern
for me, for an American citizen who is not comfortable with your
'let-every-one-in'; attitude? Why are we, the American citizens,
obligated to be fearful for our lives and security because people like
you, who live under heavy security don't really take our needs into
consideration?
And why am I obligated
to foot the bill for illegal immigrants of which many have come to our
shores with the precise intent of harming or killing me or you? Yes,
you! When the WTC was destroyed, the killers didn't differentiate
between me or you. Had you been there, you would have been protesting
President Trump's executive orders from on high.
How could a man of your
stature support and vote for a corrupt woman who compromised sensitive
national secrets, sacrificed the lives of four innocent Americans in
Libya, sold state favors for heavy cash, pocketed millions of dollars
designated for a supposed charitable fund? Save your tears for the
brave Ambassador and Marines who were thrown to the wolves by your
candidate.
I have many more
questions that I can ask you regarding your stance on the executive
order last week, after watching you, shed tears. If anything is to be
dubbed as 'un-American', Mr. Schumer, it is your tearful reaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment